Website is intended for physicians
Search:
Всего найдено: 4

 

Abstract:

This case describes successful combined treatment of patient with large hepatocellular carcinoma BCLC «B», occupying the entire right lobe of the liver, extending to the fourth segment and occupying the right lateral flank till small pelvis. As the first stage, selective tumor chemoembolization, mechanical chemoembolization of right portal vein branches with the aim of vicarious hypertrophy of remaining liver segments were performed. One and half months after performed procedure, the volume of remnant parenchyma was 31% of the total volume. According to the test with indocyanine green, the plasma elimination rate (ICG-PDR) was 12,2%/min, and the residual concentration at 15 minutes was 16%. Subsequently, was performed surgical intervention: Starzl laparotomy, revision of abdominal organs, cholecystectomy, right-sided hemihepatectomy + SI, drainage of the common bile duct according to Vishnevsky, lymphadenectomy of the hepatoduodenal ligament, drainage of abdominal cavity. Postoperative period was complicated by formation of an external biliary fistula and hepatic failure, regarded as class «B» according to criteria of the International Research Group for Liver Surgery (ISGLS), which required medical correction of patient's condition without use of extracorporeal detoxification methods. Later, patient was diagnosed with foci of recurrence of disease in the remaining parenchyma of the liver, for which endovascular treatment was carried out. Currently, patient is alive (6 years after surgery) and is receiving systemic treatment for the extrahepatic spread of the underlying disease.

 

References

1.     Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68(6): 394-424.

https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492

2.     Llovet JM, Br? C, Bruix J. Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification. Seminars in liver disease. 1999; 19(3): 329-338.

3.     Vishnevsky VA, Ayvazyan KA, Ikramov RZ, et al. Sovremennye printsipy lecheniya gepatotsellyulyarnogo raka. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii 2020; 25(2): 15-26 [In Russ].

https://doi.org/10.16931/1995-5464.2020215-26

4.     Mizuguchi T, Kawamoto M, Meguro M, et al. Preoperative liver function assessments to estimate the prognosis and safety of liver resections. Surg Today. 2014; 44(1): 1-10.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-013-0534-4

5.     European Association for the Study of the Liver. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018; 69(1): 182-236.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019

6.     Kamiyama T, Orimo T, Wakayama K, et al. Survival outcomes of hepatectomy for stage B Hepatocellular carcinoma in the BCLC classification. World J Surg Oncol. 2017; 15(1): 156.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-017-1229-x

7.     Kim H, Ahn SW, Hong SK, et al. Korean Liver Cancer Association. Survival benefit of liver resection for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2017; 104(8): 1045-1052.

https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10541

8.     Samuel M, Chow PK, Chan Shih-Yen E, et al. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; 1: CD001199.

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001199.pub2

9.     Tremosini S, Reig M, de Lope CR, et al. Treatment of early hepatocellular carcinoma: Towards personalized therapy. Dig Liver Dis. 2010; 42(3): 242-8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1590-8658(10)60512-9

10.   Bolondi L, Burroughs A, Dufour JF, et al Heterogeneity of patients with intermediate (BCLC B) Hepatocellular Carcinoma: proposal for a subclassification to facilitate treatment decisions. Semin Liver Dis. 2012; 32(4): 348-59.

https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1329906

11.   Kudo M, Arizumi T, Ueshima K, et al. Subclassification of BCLC B Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Treatment Strategies: Proposal of Modified Bolondi's Subclassification (Kinki Criteria). Dig Dis. 2015; 33(6): 751-8.

https://doi.org/10.1159/000439290

12.   Wada H, Eguchi H, Noda T, et al. Selection criteria for hepatic resection in intermediate-stage (BCLC stage B) multiple hepatocellular carcinoma. Surgery. 2016; 160(5): 1227-1235.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.05.023

13.   Wang W, Yang LY, Huang GW, et al. Genomic analysis reveals RhoC as a potential marker in hepatocellular carcinoma with poor prognosis. Br J Cancer. 2004; 90(12): 2349-55.

https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601749

14.   Yang LY, Wang W, Peng JX, et al. Differentially expressed genes between solitary large hepatocellular carcinoma and nodular hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2004; 10(24): 3569-73.

https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v10.i24.3569

15.   Chen J, Lai L, Lin Q, et al. Hepatic resection after transarterial chemoembolization increases overall survival in large/multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study. Oncotarget. 2017; 8(1): 408-417.

https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13427

16.   Pirtskhalava TL, Granov DA, Maystrenko DN. Kombinirovannaya rezektsiya pecheni i nizhnei poloi veny pri gepatotsellyulyarnom rake. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii. 2016; 21(2): 52-55 [In Russ].

https://doi.org/10.16931/1995-5464.2016252-55

17.   Granov AM, Tarazov PG, Granov DA, et al. Uspeshnoe kombinirovannoe lechenie patsienta s retsidiviruyushchei gepatotsellyulyarnoi kartsinomoi. Vestnik khirurgii imeni II Grekova. 2015; 174(2): 98-100 [In Russ].

18.   Granov DA, Polehin AS, Tarazov PG, et al. Khimioehmbolizatsiya pechenochnykh arterii u bol'nykh gepatotsellyulyarnym rakom na fone tsirroza pered transplantatsiei pecheni: prognosticheskoe znachenie kontsentratsii al'fafetoproteina. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2020; 22(4): 52-57 [In Russ].

https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2020-4-52-57

 

Abstract:

Introduction: arterial complications after orthotopic liver transplantation are common cause of graft loss (10-40%).

Aim: was to estimate efficiency of endovascular interventions in correction of revealed arterial complications in patients after OLT.

Material and methods: for the period of 2015-2020, arterial complications after 104 OLT were revealed in 24(23%) pts and were divided into 4 groups: «steal»-syndrome (n=8), hepatic artery thrombosis (n=7), combination of hepatic artery stenosis and «steal» syndrome (n=6), hepatic artery stenosis (n=3). Endovascular interventios such as splenic artery embolization, direct thrombolysis, stenting and balloon plastic were performed for correction of these complications.

Results: using of endovascular treatment, we successfully identified and correct complications with saving of the graft in 14 pts (58%), 10 pts died because of biliary necrosis, sepsis and graft loss.

Conclusion: early detection and elimination of emerging arterial complications after OLT play a keyrole in saving of organs and patients’ life.

  

 

References

1.     Gautier SV, Khomyakov SM. Organ donation and transplantation in the Russian Federation in 2018 году. 11th report from the registry of the Russian Transplant Society. Russian journal of transplantology and artificial organs. 2019; 21(3): 7-32 [In Russ].

2.     Buck DG, Zajko AB. Biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008; 11(01): 51-59.

3.     Seehofer D, Eurich D, Veltzke-Shlieker W, et al. Biliary complications after liver transplantation: old problems and new challenges. Am J Transplant. 2013; 13(02): 253-265.

4.     Ingraham C, Montenovo M. Ishemic complications after liver transplantation. Dig Dis Interv. 2018; 2: 244-248.

5.     Goldsmith LE, Wiebke K, Seal J, et al. Complications after endovascular treatment of hepatic artery stenosis after liver transplantation. J Vasc Surg. 2017; 66(5): 1488-1496.

6.     Prieto M, Gastaca M, Valdivieso A, et al. Does low hepatic artery flow increase rate of biliary strictures in deceased donor liver transplantation? Transplantation. 2017; 101(9): 311.

7.     Chen J, Weinstein J, Black S, et al. Surgical and endovascular treatment of hepatic arterial complications following liver transplant. Clin Transplant. 2014; 28(12): 1305-1312.

8.     Kim PT, Fernandez H, Gupta A, et al. Low measured hepatic artery flow increases rate of biliary strictures in deceased donor liver transplantation: an age-dependent phenomenon. Transplantation. 2017; 101(2): 332-340.

9.     Galperin EI, Kunichan MD. Manometric and debitometric study in bile ducts. Surgery. 1969; 8: 74-78 [In Russ].

10.   Polikarpov АА, Tarazov PG, Polekhin AS, et al. Biliary manometric test (BMT) to assess the effectiveness balloon plasty of strictures of the bile ducts after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Modern technologies in medicine. 2017; 9(4): 60-65 [In Russ].

11.   Buis CI, Verdonk RC, Van der Jagt EJ, et al. Nonanastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation, part 1: Radiological features and risk factors for early vs late presentation. Liver Transpl. 2007; 13: 708-718.

12.   Moiseenko AV, Polikarpov АA, Tarazov PG, et al. Method for invasive graft perfusion determination. Russian patent № 270496: 23.10.2019 2019. № 30 [In Russ].

13.   Pinto S, Reddy SN, Horrow MM, et al. Splenic artery syndrome after orthotopic liver transplantation: a review. Int J Surg. 2014; 12(11): 1228-34.

14.   Mogl N, N?ssler N, Presser S, et al. Evolving experience with prevention and treatment of splenic artery syndrome after orthotopic liver transplantation. Transpl. Int. 2010; 23(8): 831-841.

15.   Dokmak S, Aussilhou B, Belghiti J. Liver transplantation and splenic artery steal syndrome: the diagnosis should be established preoperatively. Liver Transpl. 2013; 19(6): 667-668.

16.   Grieser С, Denecke T, Steffen I, et al. Computed tomography for preoperative assessment of hepatic vasculature and prediction of splenic artery steal syndrome in patients with liver cirrhosis before transplantation. Eur. Radiol. 2010; 20(1): 108-117.

17.   Li H, Gao K, Huang Q, et al. Successful management of splenic artery steal syndrome with hepatic artery stenosis in an orthotopic liver transplant recipient. Ann. Transplant. Q. Pol. Transplant. 2014; 145-148.

18.   Strain D, Brady P, Matalon T, et al. Splenic artery embolization as treatment for splenic artery steal syndrome after liver transplantation. J. Vasc. Intervent. Radiol. 2013; 24(4): 159-160.

19.   G?m?n G, Gelley F, Doros A, et al. Biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation: The Hungarian Experience. Transplantation Proceedings. 2013; 45: 3695-3697.

20.   Lee IJ, Kim SH, Lee SD, et al. Feasibility and midterm results of endovascular treatment of hepatic artery occlusion within 24 hours after living-donor liver transplantation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017; 28(2): 269-275.

21.   Fujiki M, Hashimoto K, Palaios E, et al. Probability, management, and long-term outcomes of biliary complications after hepatic artery thrombosis in liver transplant recipients. Surgery. 2017; 162(5): 1101-1111.

 

Abstract:

A 57-year-old woman was on the waiting list of Orthotopic Liver Transplantation (OLT) due to cirrhosis of viral etiology MSCT with contrast enhancement showed two aneurysms of the splenic artery, stenosis of the celiac trunk with aneurysm of the pancreaticoduodenal artery Taking into account asymptomatic course, we decided to eradicate vascular changes during the forthcoming OLT OLT performed 6 month later, was technically difficult and complicated by massive blood loss and episodes of unstable hemodynamics, so surgical correction of aneurysms was not performed because of high risk. The patient was well and asymptomatic for 2 years after the OLT, but then she developed abdominal pain. MSCT showed progression of vascular changes. Successful endovascular treatment included celiac trunk stenting and embolization of aneurysms. 

 

References

1.      Unger L, Stork T, Bucsics T, et al. The role of TIPS in the management of liver transplant candidates. United Eur. Gastroenterol. J. 2017; 5 (8): 1100-1107.

2.      Garcia-Pagan JC, Caca K, Bureau C, et al. Early use of TIPS in patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010; 362 (25): 2370-2379.

3.      Bacalbasa N, Balescu I, Brasoveanu V. Celiac Trunk Stenosis Treated by Resection and Splenic Patch Reconstruction - A Case Report and Literature Review. In Vivo. 2018; 32 (3): 699-702.

4.      Degheili J., Chediak A., Dergham M, et al. Pancreaticoduodenal Artery Aneurysm Associated with Celiac Trunk Stenosis: Case Illustration and Literature Review. Hindawi. Case reports in radiology. Volume 2017, Article ID 6989673,7 pages.

5.      Uchida H, Sakamoto S, Matsunami M., et al. Hepatic artery reconstruction preserving the pancreaticoduodenal arcade in pediatric liver transplantation with celiac axis compression syndrome: report of a case. Pediatr. Transplant. 2014; 18 (7): 232-235.

6.      Katsura M, Gushimiyagi M, Takara H, et al. True aneurysm of the pancreaticoduodenal arteries: a single institution experience. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2010; 14 (9): 1409-1413.

7.      Chiang K, Johnson C, McKusick M, et al. Management of inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery aneurysms: a 4-year, single centre experience. CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology. 1994; 17 (4): 217-221.

8.      Koganemaru M, Abe T, Nonoshita M, et al. Follow-up of true visceral artery aneurysm after coil embolization by three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology. 2014; 20 (2): 129-135.

9.      Bastante D, Raya M, Rabelo V., et al. Analysis of ischemic cholangiopathy after treatment of arterial thrombosis in liver transplantation in our series. Transplant Proc. 2018; 50 (2): 628-630.

10.    Polikarpov AA, Tarazov PG, Granov DA, Polysalov VN. Arterial aneurysm of internal organs: the role of angiography and transcatheter embolization. Regional blood circulation and microcirculation. 2002; 1 (2): 30-36 [In Russ].

11.    Tien Y-W, Kao H-L, Wang H-P. Celiac artery stenting: a new strategy for patients with pancreaticoduodenal artery aneurysm associated with stenosis of the celiac artery. Journal of Gastroenterology. 2004; 39 (1): 81-85.

12.    Granov AM, Granov DA, Zherebcov FK, Polysalov VN, Gerasimova OA et al. Experience of 100 liver transplantation in RSCRST. Herald of surgery I.I. Grekov. 2012; 171 (2): 74-77 [In Russ].

13.    Gautier SV, Moysuk YG, Homyakov SM. Organ donation and transplantation in Russian Federation in 2014. 7-th report of National Register. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2015; 17 (2): 7-22 [In Russ].

14.    Tarazov PG, Granov DA, Polikarpov AA, Generalov MI. Orthotopic liver transplantation: The role of interventional radiology. Herald of transplantology and artificial organs. 2009; 3: 42-50 [In Russ]. 

 

 

Abstract:

Aim: was to estimate possibilities of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in diagnostics of pathology of bile ducts in combination with percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD).

Materials and methods: examined 5 patients with obstructive jaundice, suspected cancerous etiology OCT was performed during or 5-14 days after PTBD. For morphological confirmation of results we performed forceps intraductal biopsies.

Results: tomographic evidences of the malignant stricture were revealed in 4 (80%) patients anc in 1 patient benign stricture was determined. Diagnoses were confirmed histologically (80%) and clinically (20%). Sensitivity of the OCT was 100%.

Conclusion: percutaneous transhepatic OCT appeared to be a perspective method for differential diagnostics of biliary strictures. 

 

References

1.     Polikarpov A.A. Rentgenojendovaskuljarnye vmeshatel'stva v lechenii nerezektabel'nyh zlokachestvennyh opuholej pecheni. [Endovascular interventions in treatment of nonresectable malignant tumors of liver] Avtoreferat. Diss. dokt. med. nauk. S.Peterburg. 2006; S 26 [In Russ].

2.     Shajn A.A. Rak organov pishhevarenija. [Cancer of digestive organs] Tjumen'. Skorpion. 2000; 184-188 [In Russ].

3.     Soares K.C., Kamel I., Cosgrove D.P., et al. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: diagnosis, treatment options, and management. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2014; 3 (1): 18-34.

4.     Madariaga J.R., Iwatsuki S.,Todo S. et al. Liver resection for hilar and peripheral cholangiocarcinomas: a study of 62 cases. Annals of Surgery. 1998; 227 (1): 70-79.

5.     Heimbach J.K., Haddock M.G., Alberts S.R. et al. Transplantation for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Liver Transplantation. 2004; 10 (2): 65 -68.

6.     Denisenko A.G. Opticheskaja kogerentnaja tomografija v diagnostike novoobrazovanij zheludochno-kishechnogo trakta. [Optical coherence tomography in diagnostics of neoplasms of digestive tract]Avtoreferat. Diss. kand. med. nauk. N. Novgorod. 2006; S 20 [In Russ].

7.     Zagajnova E.V. Diagnosticheskaja cennost' opticheskoj kogerentnoj tomografii v jendoskopii. [Diagnostic value of optical coherence tomography in endoscopy]Avtoreferat. Diss. dokt. med. nauk. N. Novgorod. 2007; S27 [In Russ].

8.     Arvanitakis M., Hookey L., Tessier G. et al. Intraductal optical coherence tomography during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for investigation of biliary strictures. Endoscopy. 2009; 41: 696-701. [PMID: 19618343 D0I:10.1055/s-0029-1214950].

9.     de Bellis M., Sherman S., Fogel E. L. et al. Tissue sampling at ERCP in suspected malignant biliary strictures (Part 2). Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 56: 720-730 [PMID: 12397282 DOI: 10.1067/mge.2002.129219].

10.   Ross W.A., Wasan S.M., Evans D.B. et al. Combined EUS with FNA and ERCP for the evaluation of patients with obstructive jaundice from presumed pancreatic malignancy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 68: 461-466 [PMID: 18384788 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.11.033].

11.   Shahova N.M. Kliniko-jeksperimental'noe obosnovanie primenenija opticheskoj kogerentnoj tomografii v medicinskoj praktike [Clinical and experimental basics of application of optical coherence tomography in medical practice]Avtoreferat. Diss. dokt. med. nauk. N. Novgorod. 2004; 19c  [In Russ].

12.   Demin V.V., Dolgov S.A., Demin D.V. Sravnenie informativnosti opticheskoj kogerentnoj tomografii i vnutrisosudistogo ul'trazvukovogo skanirovanija dlja ocenki rezul'tatov implantacii stentov s lekarstvennym pokrytiem. Materialy V rossijskogo s'ezda intervencionnyh kardioangiologov. [Comparison of informative value of optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in estimation of results of implantation of drug-eluting stents.] Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal intervencionnoj kardioangiologii. 2013; 35: 41- 42 [In Russ].

13.   Mahmud S.M., May G.R., Kamal M.M. et al. Imaging pancreatobiliary ductal system with optical coherence tomography: A review. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2013; 5(11): 540-550. ISSN 1948-5190 (online).

14.   Tearney G.J., Brezinski M.E., Southern J.F. et al. Optical biopsy in human pancreatobiliary tissue using optical coherence tomography. Dig DisSci. 1998; 43: 11931199 [PMID: 9635607 DOI: 10.1023/A:1018891304453].

15.   Testoni P.A., Mariani A., Mangiavillano B. et al. Main pancreatic duct, common bile duct and sphincter of Oddi structure visualized by optical coherence tomography: An ex vivo study compared with histology. Dig Liver Dis. 2006; 38: 409-414 [PMID: 16584931 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld. 2006.02.014].

16.   Testoni P.A., Mangiavillano B. Optical coherence tomography in detection of dysplasia and cancer of the gastrointestinal tract and bilio-pancreatic ductal system. World J Gastroenterol. 2008; 14: 6444-6452 [PMID: 19030194 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.14.6444].

17.   Testoni P.A., Mariani A., Mangiavillano B. Intraductal optical coherence tomography for investigating main pancreatic duct strictures. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007; 102: 269-274 [PMID: 17100970 DOI: 10.1111/j. 1572-0241. 2006.00940.x].

 

 

ANGIOLOGIA.ru (АНГИОЛОГИЯ.ру) - портал о диагностике и лечении заболеваний сосудистой системы